Qur’an and textual Issues
|
Traditional Account |
Other complexities |
Western Critical Approaches |
|
|
|
|
Oldest surviving manuscripts |
`Uthmanic
manuscripts from 650 CE |
`Uthmanic
manuscripts in scriptio defectiva |
Age of `Uthmanic
manuscripts cannot be scientifically verified; Oldest
complete, dated manuscript of Quran dates to 1002
CE |
|
|
|
|
Question of Canon |
Canon was established
during Muhammad’s lifetime |
Issue of Abrogation raises
questions on canon: f.i. “Stoning Verse” |
Early, pre-`Uthmanic Muslim tradition contains narratives about
alternating canons, lost verses, or suppressed Shi’ite
verses |
|
|
|
|
Reliability of transmission of text? |
`Uthmanic
manuscripts and insistence on oral tradition; the famed memory and poetic capabilityof the Arabs |
“scriptio defectiva” does
not limit recitation to one, but several (7/10/14) qira`at, all of which are
authorized readings . |
Variety of “qira’at” raises
questions about reliability of transmission of text. |
|
|
|
|
Broader Questions of Origin of Qur’an |
Traditional biography of
Muhammad, and traditional portrayal of pre-Islamic |
Issue of difficult
vocabulary in the Qur’an is part of the miracle, as it shows the supernatural
origin of the Qur’an, and indicates that human beings cannot penetrate all
the mysteries of the Qur’an. |
From a historical –
critical perspective, Qur’anic materials, esp. Qur’anic narratives about biblical prophets and highly
developed Qur’anic Christology do not fit the Arabian
background. Difficult and
incomprehensible vocabulary in the Qur’an is an indication that there is a
considerable time-lapse between the composition of the verses and Muslim
engagement with its meaning / interpretation: Either material of the Qur’an
pre-dates the seventh century, or Qur’an only becomes standardized 200 years
later. |